Sunday, June 10, 2018

Minerology on Mars Points to a Cold and Icy Ancient Climate

Researchers expect the volcanoes in Mars’ Sisyphi Planum region to look similar to subglacial volcanoes on earth, such as Herðubreið in Iceland. (Purdue University photo/Sheridan Ackiss)

The climate throughout Mars’ early history has long been debated – was the Red Planet warm and wet, or cold and icy? New research published in Icarus provides evidence for the latter.

Mars is littered with valley networks, deltas and lake deposits, meaning it must have had freely flowing water at some point, probably around 4 billion years ago. But climate models of the planet’s deep past haven’t been able to produce warm enough conditions to allow liquid water on the surface.

“There are people trying to model Mars’ ancient climate using the same kind of models we use here on Earth, and they’re having a really hard time doing it. It’s difficult to create a warm ancient Mars because the sun was a lot fainter then. The whole solar system was cooler,” said Briony Horgan, an assistant professor of earth, atmospheric and planetary sciences at Purdue University. “While a lot of people are using climate models, we’re coming at this from a unique perspective – what does the volcanic record of Mars tell us?”

Volcanism was abundant throughout Mars’ early history. There are large, broad volcanoes on some of the planet’s widely studied regions, but less is known about a region of low and smooth topography in the southern highlands known as Sisyphi Planum. Here, there are more than 100 flat-topped mounds known as the Sisyphi Montes, which could be volcanic in origin.

When volcanoes erupt beneath ice sheets and glaciers on Earth, the combination of heat and melt water create flat-topped, steep-sided mountains called “tuyas,” or table mountains. When subglacial eruptions don’t breach the surface of the ice, the tops of the volcanoes remain cone-shaped instead of becoming flat. The minerology produced during these events is unique due to the interaction between hot lava and cold glacial meltwater.

Sheridan Ackiss, a Ph.D. candidate at Purdue and lead author of the paper, used images from NASA’s Compact Reconnaissance Imaging Spectrometers for Mars (CRISM) to find out if the mineral makeup of the region was consistent with subglacial volcanism.

CRISM detects both the visible range and shorter wavelengths of light, which helps the instrument’s operators identify a broad range of minerals on the Martian surface. At visible wavelengths, the way light is reflected is strongly influenced by iron, whereas at infrared wavelengths, CRISM can pick up features from carbonate, sulfate, hydroxyl and water incorporated in mineral crystals.

“Each rock has a specific fingerprint, and you can identify that with reflections of light,” Ackiss said.

The findings identify three distinct mineral combinations in the region, dominated by gypsum, polyhydrated sulfates and a smectite-zeolite-iron oxide mixture – all of which have been associated with volcanoes in glacial environments. 

“We now have two sets of data, minerals and morphology, that say there had to have been ice on Mars at some point in time,” said Ackiss. “And it was probably relatively late in Mars’ history.”

Ackiss’ team hopes their findings can be used as a reference point for other regions on Mars with a volcanic history. If researchers could find evidence for volcanic activity under ice sheets elsewhere, it would solidify the case for a very cold ancient Mars. But fear not, space enthusiasts, this doesn’t eliminate the possibility of past life on Mars.

“Even if Mars was a cold and icy wasteland, these volcanic eruptions interacting with ice sheets could have created a little happy place for microbes to exist,” Horgan said. “This is the kind of place you’d want to go to understand how life would’ve survived on Mars during that time.” 

Credit: purdue.edu

1 comment:

  1. Interesting report, but based on fundamentally flawed assumptions about the connections between mineralogy and environment and false distinctions between "warm wet" and "cold icy" models for martian paleoclimate.

    For example the statement "The findings identify three distinct mineral combinations in the region, dominated by gypsum, polyhydrated sulfates and a smectite-zeolite-iron oxide mixture – all of which have been associated with volcanoes in glacial environments." is vacuous as these minerals are known in form in a wide range environments including hydrothermal, hot deserts, cold deserts and seasonally wet tropics. This has been known for decades by soil scientists and regolith geologists, but not by these researchers it would seem.

    Then there is the truly bizarre assertion "“We now have two sets of data, minerals and morphology, that say there had to have been ice on Mars at some point in time.... And it was probably relatively late in Mars’ history.” We can see the ice on the surface now and detect it in the subsurface. There is no need to infer it from morphology and mineralogy.

    The false dichotomy between "warm wet" and "cold icy" models for martian paleoclimate is particularly irksome. They are really saying the same thing. No matter how cold and icy early Mars as (and it may well have been both) it was still warm enough for widespread evidence for liquid water on the surface of Mars- rivers, drainage networks, channels, lakes, and seas. Just because models can't explain them is irrelevant, the models are clearly wrong and need to be fixed to represent reality. The same models can't explain liquid water on early Earth, so we should not expect them to work on Mars.

    ReplyDelete